• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Downtown Austin Blog

downtown Austin's real estate and neighborhood blog

You are here: Home / Archives for Jude Galligan

Jude Galligan

Machete Filming In Downtown Austin

Jude Galligan | August 13, 2009 |

If you’ve been downtown today, then you’ve likely noticed the myriad of film trucks parked from Whole Foods to Sabine.  Robert Rodriguez is shooting his latest film Machete.  Robert DeNiro has been spotted by residents of the Brazos Lofts watching from across the street.

HeadOfMetal has uploaded some photos to Flickr.

Cool!

Filed Under: downtown austin

Perspectives On The Warehouse District – Part 1

Jude Galligan | August 13, 2009 |

Downtown Austin is largely defined by its districts, unique destinations bound by similar geography and form.  As it exists today the Warehouse District has significance as a cool place to visit, but it’s debatable if it has historic significance.  Capital view corridors, which place height restrictions throughout the much of downtown, are conspicuously absent over the Warehouse District and the low-slung properties are worth a fortune.  This brings up the discussion of should the Warehouse District be protected by landmarking the buildings.

ROMA has come up with an interesting solution. Property owners inside the Warehouse District are incentivized to sell their surplus density/air rights.  This would allow property owners to capture the value of their building’s entitlements without changing the streetscape. City Council is scheduled to vote on this solution, as part of a larger density bonus program, on August 20th.

Two of downtown Austin’s most active and respected stakeholders, Roger Cauvin and Michael McGill, have divergent opinions on what they would like to see happen.  They have graciously agreed to share their perspectives which I will publish in two parts.

From Roger Cauvin:

“While the Warehouse District is currently a great asset for downtown, I believe it can be an even greater asset if the city facilitates, and doesn’t obstruct, its densification.

Some of the sentiment for preserving the character and height of the Warehouse District stems from a reflexive resistance to change. In almost every mature neighborhood in Austin, long-time residents develop a fondness for the existing character of their neighborhood and fear that changes will disturb what they value about it. And new developments with sprawling parking lots and unimaginative designs lend credence to these fears. Nevertheless, these citizens give little consideration to the possibility that change can lead to neighborhoods that are more walkable, more vibrant, and more charming over time.

Downtown has usually been the exception to this rule. Downtown residents have generally embraced height and density. But downtown is not immune to resistance to change. As someone who grew fond of entertainment in the Warehouse District in the 1990s and has lived a block away for more than seven years, I myself fear the unknown – what will happen to it if it densifies?

Fortunately, observing the reflexive resistance to change in other neighborhoods has given me perspective. I know that I must put aside my fear of the unknown and realize that increased height and density in the Warehouse District will likely make it and the rest of downtown even more vibrant and even more walkable than it currently is. A greater concentration of residents and workers in the Warehouse District will increase the demand for, and viability of, pedestrian-oriented retail all over downtown. It’s important to recognize that the charm of the Warehouse District comes not just from its modest height, but its pedestrian orientation.

Former Mayor Wynn had a vision of 25,000 residents living downtown. He saw that radically increasing the number of downtown residents would yield many benefits to the core and to Austin as a whole. The Warehouse District is one of the few areas of downtown unencumbered by Capitol View Corridors. Restricting its height and densification would severely impact the potential for increasing the number of residents downtown to realize Mayor Wynn’s vision. Erecting barriers in an effort to preserve the height of the Warehouse District not only comes dangerously close to the NIMBY mindset pervasive in other neighborhoods; it also undermines the larger downtown vision that many of us share.”

Filed Under: development, downtown austin, Real Estate Tagged With: warehouse district

Look For Changes On West 6th

Jude Galligan | August 12, 2009 |

The Daily Texan is reporting that we can expect a major face on W 6th including a new hotel. “The hotel will be a first-class, garden-style, low-rise, contemporary boutique hotel”.

Filed Under: downtown austin

Bel Air Auction Latest – Did The Auction Work?

Jude Galligan | August 11, 2009 |

This past Sunday the Bel Air auction was hosted at the Hilton hotel.  I was out of town, unfortunately, and was not able to record the winning bids. Keye reported 300+ attendees.  All of the units had a winning bidder.

After Brazos Place, the Bel Air auction was the second high profile condo auction in Austin.  There was some speculation in my office that the undisclosed reserve would be roughly 2/3 of the original price.  My sources indicate that most of the winning bids were in the ballpark of 60% of the original list price, but these were all won “Sold Subject To Confirmation.”

Here is the shocker:  Of the 25 units that were auctioned at the Bel Air condos, only two of the winning bids were accepted! The Seller/bank was still negotiating hours after the auction and many of the units  may have added 5-10% on top of the winning bid [and on top of the 4% buyers premium] in order to meet the reserve minimum.

The auction rules clearly state that the Seller was allowed to set a reserve:

“All homes have an unpublished reserve price (Unpublished Reserve Price) which means that the seller has established an unpublished minimum selling price. The Starting Bid is not the reserve price. In order to become the winning bidder of a home, a bidder must have the highest bid and meet or exceed the unpublished reserve price. The highest bid is subject to acceptance by the seller (see ‘Subject to Confirmation’ section below). With respect to a high bid less than the seller’s reserve, the high bid and resulting purchase agreement/offer are subject to the seller’s acceptance, counter-offer or rejection during the auction, in the contract room, and/or within 3 days following the auction.”

The rules go on to state…

“With respect to a winning bid that is not immediately accepted by the seller, the auctioneer will inform the winning bidder that acceptance of their winning bid is ‘Sold Subject to Confirmation.’  The winning bidder acknowledges and agrees that winning bidder’s purchase/offer is subject to and contingent upon the seller approving the resulting purchase/offer, acceptance, counter-offer or rejection during the auction, in the contract room and/or within 3 days following the auction.”

Over the next couple of days we will see how the dust settles.  Because it was behind closed doors we don’t know how many of the auctioned units actually went under contract nor where the final negotiated price ended up for those units.  I wouldn’t be surprised if someone from the DAB readership was in attendance.  If so, please share your experience in the comments! 🙂

If we can confirm the final negotiated prices, then it appears we can expect the average clearing price at Bel Air condos to be in line with what I’ve been suggesting: a  25-35% discount is the magic number for a developer to quickly unload condos in bulk, in either the open market or the auction market.

When the undisclosed reserve is set too far above what the market is expecting it can ruin the effectiveness of the auction.  It’s situations like this that I suggest bidders bring a Realtor they trust – per the rules of the auction it cost bidders nothing – and they can help with strategy, understanding the project’s history, and negotiating when unexpected scenarios like this occur.

-Jude

Filed Under: austin condo auction, Real Estate Tagged With: bel air, bel air auction, bel air austin, Bel Air Condos, condo auction

W Hotel May Need More Cash

Jude Galligan | August 10, 2009 |

Just found this article in the ABJ. Once $128MM in construction financing is spent, Stratus and Canyon-Johnson will need to find additional sources of capital. From a buyer’s perspective, I would want to see that financing in place before entering into a contract.

From StreetInsider.com

“The joint venture is aggressively pursuing other options for financing the future construction costs of the W Austin Hotel & Residences project after the required capital contributions are made. Such options may include additional equity contributions by Stratus and Canyon-Johnson, financing from other financial institutions, admitting new equity partners, or a combination of these alternatives. If the joint venture does not secure project financing from a third-party lender, or if Stratus or Canyon-Johnson is unable to make required additional future capital contributions to the joint venture, the joint venture may be required to delay further construction of the project until additional financing is available. “

-Jude

Filed Under: downtown austin Tagged With: w hotel

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 96
  • Go to page 97
  • Go to page 98
  • Go to page 99
  • Go to page 100
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 149
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Archives

TOWERS.net – Austin Condos For Sale

TOWERS realty
LEGAL NOTICE: Texas Real Estate Commission Consumer Protection Notice. • Information About Brokerage Services. • Copyright © 2007-2022 Jude Galligan. All rights reserved. Site Map